Compare structure, not impressions
Line two crawls up on topics, hubs, and link depth instead of scrolling a homepage.
See exactly where a competitor is ahead.
See what changed, what is missing, and where they are stronger.
Comparing two sites is useful and tedious. The honest version takes hours of exports. The fast version is a handful of spot checks and a guess.
How the comparison stays fair
See what moved since last time
Diff your own history after a migration or launch and see what changed, page by page.
Turn the gap list into work
Each difference stays attached to the pages that demonstrate it, ready for briefs and tickets.
The work it takes off your plate
Side-by-side scrape context
Compare two sites or crawls with rendered content, headings, and links still attached.
Competitor gap detection
See where competitors have stronger coverage, deeper hubs, or clearer structure.
Historical crawl comparison
Check migrations, launches, and optimization work against the prior scrape.
Template and structure analysis
See how page types, depth, and internal linking differ across sites or sections.
Agent-parsed differences
Let agents summarize the important gaps instead of reasoning over pasted exports.
Strategy-ready gap lists
Turn comparisons into content, linking, and technical work that points at real pages.
Same evidence on both sides
Crawl the competitor with the same rendered model you use on your own site.
Topic coverage diffs
See which subjects they support that you do not, and the other way around.
No more spot-check reviews
Replace five browser tabs and a guess with two structured scrapes.
Related use cases
Give agents SEO evidence, not slop
Crawl, chunk, and embed any site on your machine, then hand your agents the passages and page evidence behind every answer.
free to start